Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ben Munat's avatar

Ah yeah, that sounds like the right direction. As realistic a work exchange as it can be would be ideal, at least from my perspective. I have test anxiety pretty bad and a clock ticking away paralyzes me. But if the time limit is less important than the dialog, then that seems like it should work well. I know that not everyone has that timer anxiety but I'm finding out that it is more common than most people think. If split-second decision making is mission-critical, then by all means, hold the candidate's feet to the fire. But if they will just be working a roadmap and delivering features, then adding in hard time limits just shrinks your valid candidate pool. My three cents (inflation, don't ya know).

Expand full comment
Danish Chopra's avatar

Interviewing your own interviewers for calibration and training them goes a long way too.

Asking managers for their north star and justification helps too.

On a side note, most Managers like to grow by adding more people to their team (horizontal growth) more than working on the growth of their existing team (vertical growth). If we reward vertical growth more than horizontal growth for managers, we will automatically discourage inflated hiring and hire only what’s required.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts